Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving
| От | Kenneth Marshall |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20080717175418.GK337@it.is.rice.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:42:39PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Xiao Meng escribi?: > > The patch store hash code only in the index tuple. > > It based on Neil Conway's patch with an old version of PostgreSQL. > > It passes the regression test but I didn't test the performance yet. > > Anyone interested can make a performance test;-) > > You can undefine the macro HASHVALUE_ONLY in hash.h to get the > > original implementation. > > I think having the HASHVALUE_ONLY define is not a good idea -- it just > makes the patch harder to read. I suggest just removing the old code > and putting the new code in place. (That's why we have revision > control.) > One thing it helps is building an old version and a new version for comparative testing. Otherwise, you could end up with an apples-to- oranges comparison. I certainly think that the final patch should not have it, but it is useful now for testing and comparisons. My two cents, Ken
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: