Re: threads stuff/UnixWare
От
Marc G. Fournier
Тема
Re: threads stuff/UnixWare
Дата
Msg-id
20040512150142.U35531@ganymede.hub.org
Ответ на
Re: threads stuff/UnixWare (Larry Rosenman)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
threads stuff/UnixWare Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>
Re: threads stuff/UnixWare "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>
Re: threads stuff/UnixWare Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>
Re: threads stuff/UnixWare "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>
Re: threads stuff/UnixWare Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>
Re: threads stuff/UnixWare "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>
Re: threads stuff/UnixWare Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>
Re: threads stuff/UnixWare "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>
Re: threads stuff/UnixWare Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>
Re: threads stuff/UnixWare "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>
Re: threads stuff/UnixWare Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>
Re: threads stuff/UnixWare "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>
Re: threads stuff/UnixWare Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: threads stuff/UnixWare Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>
Re: threads stuff/UnixWare Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: threads stuff/UnixWare Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>
Re: threads stuff/UnixWare Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: threads stuff/UnixWare Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>
Re: threads stuff/UnixWare Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: threads stuff/UnixWare Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>
Re: threads stuff/UnixWare "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>
Re: threads stuff/UnixWare Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>
Re: threads stuff/UnixWare "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>
Re: threads stuff/UnixWare Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: threads stuff/UnixWare Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>
On Wed, 12 May 2004, Larry Rosenman wrote: > > > --On Wednesday, May 12, 2004 14:14:30 -0300 "Marc G. Fournier" > wrote: > > > On Wed, 12 May 2004, Larry Rosenman wrote: > > > >> I'd LIKE to be able to have PG wrappers for those functions, and have > >> the first invocation of them look via dlsym() for the real ones, and if > >> they are NOT there, use fake functions that assume we are NOT threaded. > > > > Wouldn't it be easier to have a #define? > > > > Correct me if I'm wrong here, but the problem is that we are expecting > > thread functinos to be called x_, while Unixware defines them as pthread_, > > right? so make Unixware specific #defines that map x_ to pthread_ ... > No, we are expecting them to have pthread_*. > > On UnixWare, to get the pthread_* functions, you need to invoke a compiler > option (-Kpthread), to cause libpthread to be linked in. > > Since libpq.so now REQUIRES the function, we need to either: > > 1) force ANY program that uses libpq to be compiled/linked with -Kpthread Ummm, shouldn't that be added to the port specific Makefile? ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления