Re: The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org

On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 07:01:47PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Actually, proposal (A) does provide such a separation: notice that the
> projects would go under *.postgresql.net, with the core database remaining
> at *.postgresql.org.  I am not sure if that will provoke confusion or
> not, but I think I like it better than pgfoundry because it is clear
> that the domains are related.  pgfoundry seems a bit, um, random.

Agree with the last bit, but I really feel that the difference between
postgresql.org and postgresql.net is too subtle--at least for people who
don't work with either very often.

Here's another idea: couldn't we have a subdomain for the projects, as in
"<project>.forge.postgresql.org"?  Or would that be too long?


Jeroen