Re: autocommit in 7.4
От
Bruce Momjian
Тема
Re: autocommit in 7.4
Дата
Msg-id
200307311426.h6VEQgP17293@candle.pha.pa.us
Ответ на
Re: autocommit in 7.4 (Tom Lane)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
autocommit in 7.4 Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: autocommit in 7.4 marcus.boerger@t-online.de (Marcus Börger)
Re: autocommit in 7.4 Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: autocommit in 7.4 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: autocommit in 7.4 Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: autocommit in 7.4 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: autocommit in 7.4 Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > The issue I have is that every interface that relies on libpq is going > > to have to code it itself. Is that OK? > > So? Most interfaces have to adhere to their own notions of transaction > semantics and control API anyway. libpq should stay out of their way > rather than try to be helpful. I see this as not different from the > lesson we learned that doing it in the backend isn't the right place. I know Perl and jdbc do, but things like c++ and libpgeasy don't really have a specification to follow. With the ability to check the transaction status, it might now be easy enough to do autocommit that having it happen in every interfaces will be ok. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления