Re: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT
Дата
Msg-id
16785.1519500083@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
Re: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>
Re: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>
Re: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>
Re: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
RE: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT Jonathan Allen <jallen@americansavingslife.com>
Re: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
RE: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT Jonathan Allen <jallen@americansavingslife.com>
RE: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT Jonathan Allen <jallen@americansavingslife.com>
Re: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
RE: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT Huong Dangminh <huo-dangminh@ys.jp.nec.com>
Re: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
RE: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT Huong Dangminh <huo-dangminh@ys.jp.nec.com>
Re: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
RE: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT Huong Dangminh <huo-dangminh@ys.jp.nec.com>
Re: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
RE: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT Huong Dangminh <huo-dangminh@ys.jp.nec.com>
Re: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Andrew Gierth writes: > Solution.pm has this: > #if (_MSC_VER > 1200) > #define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT_64 1 > #define ENABLE_THREAD_SAFETY 1 > #endif > from which HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT seems to be suspiciously missing? I remember noticing that discrepancy recently when I was chasing something else about int64 support. It certainly looks wrong, but not being much of an ecpg user I was hesitant to touch it. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления
От: Andrew Gierth
Дата:
От: Michael Meskes
Дата: