Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off
Дата
Msg-id
16395.1303751481@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL
off Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL
off Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL
off Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL
off Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL
off Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with
SSL off Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL
off Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Robert Haas writes: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> I'm inclined to think that the correct fix is to make parse_hba_line, >> where it first realizes the line is "hostssl", check not only that SSL >> support is compiled but that it's turned on. > It's not clear to me what behavior you are proposing. Would we > disregard the hostssl line or treat it as an error? Sorry, I wasn't clear. I meant to throw an error. We already do throw an error if you put hostssl in pg_hba.conf when SSL support wasn't compiled at all. Why shouldn't we throw an error if it's compiled but not turned on? Or we could go in the direction of making hostssl lines be a silent no-op in both cases, but that doesn't seem like especially user-friendly design to me. We don't treat any other cases in pg_hba.conf comparably AFAIR. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Magnus Hagander
Дата: