Re: [RFC] Common object property boards
От
Alvaro Herrera
Тема
Re: [RFC] Common object property boards
Дата
Msg-id
1312820469-sup-9000@alvh.no-ip.org
Ответ на
Re: [RFC] Common object property boards (Robert Haas)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
[RFC] Common object property boards Kohei Kaigai <Kohei.Kaigai@EMEA.NEC.COM>
Re: [RFC] Common object property boards Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [RFC] Common object property boards Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [RFC] Common object property boards Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>
Re: [RFC] Common object property boards Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: [RFC] Common object property boards Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [RFC] Common object property boards Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: [RFC] Common object property boards Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [RFC] Common object property boards Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>
Re: [RFC] Common object property boards Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>
Re: [RFC] Common object property boards Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [RFC] Common object property boards Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>
Re: [RFC] Common object property boards Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: [RFC] Common object property boards Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [RFC] Common object property boards Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: [RFC] Common object property boards Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [RFC] Common object property boards Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: [RFC] Common object property boards Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [RFC] Common object property boards Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [RFC] Common object property boards Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [RFC] Common object property boards Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>
Re: [RFC] Common object property boards Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of lun ago 08 12:05:05 -0400 2011: > We could do that, but what the heck is the point? What benefit are > we trying to get by not returning a pointer to the structure? I feel > like we're making this ludicrously complicated with no real > justification of why all of this complexity is adding any value. I don't see that it's complicated in any way. Seems pretty simple to me. The justification is simple too: don't export struct definitions without need. -- Álvaro Herrera The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата: