Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 0353e30e-3254-6ec4-a832-9ca3215b00b2@BlueTreble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017 (Peter van Hardenberg <pvh@pvh.ca>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/13/17 3:09 PM, Peter van Hardenberg wrote: > A new data type, and/or a new index type could both be nicely scoped > bits of work. Did you have any particular data/index types in mind? Personally I'd love something that worked like a python dictionary, but I'm not sure how that'd work without essentially supporting a variant data type. I've got code for a variant type[1], and I don't think there's any holes in it, but the casting semantics are rather ugly. IIRC that problem appeared to be solvable if there was a hook in the current casting code right before Postgres threw in the towel and said a cast was impossible. 1: https://github.com/BlueTreble/variant/ -- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com 855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: