Re: Issues with my patch on the groups of servers
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Issues with my patch on the groups of servers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | y2t937d27e11004260301jb64d9009g71c511957175f6b6@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Issues with my patch on the groups of servers (Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>) |
Ответы |
Re: Issues with my patch on the groups of servers
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: > Hi, > > While working on the connection combobox for frmQuery, I found some > rather amusing (or not) bugs in my patch for groups of servers. It seems > there are quite a few use of the browser that don't like groups. pgAdmin > doesn't crash, but is not more able to discover servers. Take > dlgSelectConnection for example. It doesn't crash pgAdmin, but a user > can't select a new connection because the dialog doesn't find servers > and disables server and database comboboxes. And I think other > components will be hit by this. > > There is surely simple fixes for them. Problem is: I'm not sure I'll > have the time to work on those. It could be I will, but I'm simply not sure. > > So, I'm a bit hesitant on what to do. I could revert my previous patch, > and push it in once it's clearly good... but it could be good enought, > one day after the release of beta 1. I could also try to fix the issues > (I don't think they are that many), but what should we do if I can't > have a good enough behaviour when beta 1 will be wrapped up? > > I'm actually working on these bugs. So I kind of prefer #2. Any strong > opinion on this? I prefer 2 as well. It's not the end of the world if beta 1 isn't perfect though, as long it's it's not completely broken. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: