Re: more 10K disks or less 15K disks
От | Anj Adu |
---|---|
Тема | Re: more 10K disks or less 15K disks |
Дата | |
Msg-id | o2pf2fd819a1004281128k4ded168dsaa69aca26fc26638@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | more 10K disks or less 15K disks (Anj Adu <fotographs@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: more 10K disks or less 15K disks
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
I forgot to add that the 24 10K disks are 2.5 inch and the 12 15K disks are 3.5 inch On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Anj Adu <fotographs@gmail.com> wrote: > I am faced with a hardware choice for a postgres data warehouse > (extremely high volume inserts..over 200 million records a day) with a > total storage of either > > 12 x 600G disks (15K) (the new Dell Poweredge C server) > > or > > 24 x 600G (10K disks) > > ALL direct attached storage. > > I am leaning toward the 24 disks as I expect the higher number of > disks to provide overall better performance under high loads > > Does anyone have any experience with a mixed 10K / 15K DAS storage > that you can share. > > Thank you > > Sriram >
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: