Re: Spinlock performance improvement proposal
От | Doug McNaught |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Spinlock performance improvement proposal |
Дата | |
Msg-id | m38zf13gn9.fsf@belphigor.mcnaught.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Spinlock performance improvement proposal ("D. Hageman" <dhageman@dracken.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Spinlock performance improvement proposal
Re: Spinlock performance improvement proposal |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"D. Hageman" <dhageman@dracken.com> writes: > The plan for the new spinlocks does look like it has some potential. My > only comment in regards to permformance when we start looking at SMP > machines is ... it is my belief that getting a true threaded backend may > be the only way to get the full potential out of SMP machines. Depends on what you mean. For scaling well with many connections and simultaneous queries, there's no reason IMHO that the current process-per-backend model won't do, assuming the locking issues are addressed. If you're talking about making a single query use multiple CPUs, then yes, we're probably talking about a fundamental rewrite to use threads or some other mechanism. -Doug -- In a world of steel-eyed death, and men who are fighting to be warm, Come in, she said, I'll give you shelter from the storm. -Dylan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: