Re: [HACKERS] Syntax errors in current tree
От | D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Syntax errors in current tree |
Дата | |
Msg-id | m102EHU-0000bmC@druid.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Syntax errors in current tree (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Syntax errors in current tree
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thus spake Bruce Momjian > Fixed. I assume people test the patches before submission, so I don't Not an unreasonable assumption. > usually compile after each one. I did add some code in gram.y, and that > was what caused the problem. I don't think that the core maintainers should have to compile each and every patch before committing it. However, perhaps a form letter can go out to each new submitter asking if their patch was tested and holding their first patch till they respond affirmatively. Once they have a history, even of one patch, then accept their submissions as long as they appear good. Maybe we need a way to track this. Anyone know of a good system for tracking this sort of BASic DATA. :-) > Sorry. Blech (Sound of me falling on my sword. :-)) That's OK. I just hope it was lying flat on the ground at the time. :-) -- D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@{druid|vex}.net> | Democracy is three wolves http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on +1 416 424 2871 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: