Re: TRANSACTION FOR AN UPDATE COMMAND WITH ONE TABLE
От
Jaime Casanova
Тема
Re: TRANSACTION FOR AN UPDATE COMMAND WITH ONE TABLE
Дата
Msg-id
i2k3073cc9b1004061331w8d78da7em35d4d2185781183e@mail.gmail.com
Ответ на
TRANSACTION FOR AN UPDATE COMMAND WITH ONE TABLE (JORGE MALDONADO)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
TRANSACTION FOR AN UPDATE COMMAND WITH ONE TABLE JORGE MALDONADO <jorgemal1960@gmail.com>
Re: TRANSACTION FOR AN UPDATE COMMAND WITH ONE TABLE "Rob Richardson" <Rob.Richardson@rad-con.com>
Re: TRANSACTION FOR AN UPDATE COMMAND WITH ONE TABLE Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec>
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 2:23 PM, JORGE MALDONADO wrote: > I have an UPDATE command which modifies several records of one (only one) > table. > Is it feasible (or a good idea) to include it in a transaction block to make > sure the process is performed with integrity? PostgreSQL runs everything that is not inside a transaction block inside it's own implicit transaction (one implicit transaction per statement). so begin; update .... commit; it's the same as: update .... and update table1 ... update table2 ... it's the same as: begin; update table1 ... commit; begin; update table2 ... commit; -- Atentamente, Jaime Casanova Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas Guayaquil - Ecuador Cel. +59387171157
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления