Re: Simplifying our Trap/Assert infrastructure
От
Peter Eisentraut
Тема
Re: Simplifying our Trap/Assert infrastructure
Дата
Msg-id
f64365b1-d5f9-ef83-41fe-404810f10e5a@enterprisedb.com
Ответ на
Re: Simplifying our Trap/Assert infrastructure (Michael Paquier)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Simplifying our Trap/Assert infrastructure Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Simplifying our Trap/Assert infrastructure Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Re: Simplifying our Trap/Assert infrastructure Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Re: Simplifying our Trap/Assert infrastructure Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Simplifying our Trap/Assert infrastructure Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Simplifying our Trap/Assert infrastructure Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Simplifying our Trap/Assert infrastructure Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Simplifying our Trap/Assert infrastructure Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Simplifying our Trap/Assert infrastructure Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Simplifying our Trap/Assert infrastructure Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Simplifying our Trap/Assert infrastructure Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Simplifying our Trap/Assert infrastructure Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Re: Simplifying our Trap/Assert infrastructure Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
On 31.10.22 01:04, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 09:36:23AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> Would there be a use for that? It's currently only used in the atomics >> code. > > Yep, but they would not trigger when using atomics in the frontend > code. We don't have any use for that in core on HEAD, still that > could be useful for some external frontend code? Please see the > attached. I don't think we need separate definitions for frontend and backend, since the contained Assert() will take care of the difference. So the attached would be simpler.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Etsuro Fujita
Дата: