Re: SSD + RAID

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Scott Marlowe
Тема
Re: SSD + RAID
Дата
Msg-id
dcc563d11002221821p773906a5hf3d3ffaf39bbddc6@mail.gmail.com
Ответ на
Re: SSD + RAID (Greg Smith)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: SSD + RAID "Kenny Gorman" <KGorman@hi5.com>
Re: SSD + RAID Kenny Gorman <kgorman@hi5.com>
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Greg Smith  wrote:
> Mark Mielke wrote:
>>
>> I had read the above when posted, and then looked up SRAM. SRAM seems to
>> suggest it will hold the data even after power loss, but only for a period
>> of time. As long as power can restore within a few minutes, it seemed like
>> this would be ok?
>
> The normal type of RAM everyone uses is DRAM, which requires constrant
> "refresh" cycles to keep it working and is pretty power hungry as a result.
>  Power gone, data gone an instant later.

Actually, oddly enough, per bit stored dram is much lower power usage
than sram, because it only has something like 2 transistors per bit,
while sram needs something like 4 or 5 (it's been a couple decades
since I took the classes on each).  Even with the constant refresh,
dram has a lower power draw than sram.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления
От: Greg Smith
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: SSD + RAID
От: Scott Marlowe
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: SSD + RAID
FAQ