Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works
От
Fabien COELHO
Тема
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works
Дата
Msg-id
alpine.DEB.2.21.1808120916590.6189@lancre
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>
> [...] > > At this point I'm inclined to give up and revert 3a60c8ff8. It's not > clear that we can really make the warning situation better, as opposed > to just moving the warnings from one platform to another. Indeed, there are hundreds of warnings around "pg_printf_attribute_m" added with gcc 7.3.0 on by ubuntu 18.04 laptop, thanks to 3a60c8ff. A revert would help. -- Fabien.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления