Re: pg_receivewal starting position

On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 08:29:54AM +0200, Ronan Dunklau wrote:
> Ok, do you want me to propose a different patch for previous versions ?

That's not necessary.  Thanks for proposing.

> Do you mean restart_lsn as the pointer argument to the function, or 
> restart_lsn as the field returned by the command ? If it's the first, I'll 
> change it but if it's the latter it is expected that we sometime run this on a 
> slot where WAL has never been reserved yet.

restart_lsn as the pointer of the function.
--
Michael