Re: ps command does not show walsender's connected db
От
Michael Paquier
Тема
Re: ps command does not show walsender's connected db
Дата
Msg-id
Y3wbe2dnxh9B4fLF@paquier.xyz
Ответ на
Re: ps command does not show walsender's connected db (Ian Lawrence Barwick)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
ps command does not show walsender's connected db bt22nakamorit <bt22nakamorit@oss.nttdata.com>
Re: ps command does not show walsender's connected db Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
Re: ps command does not show walsender's connected db bt22nakamorit <bt22nakamorit@oss.nttdata.com>
Re: ps command does not show walsender's connected db Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
Re: ps command does not show walsender's connected db Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
Re: ps command does not show walsender's connected db bt22nakamorit <bt22nakamorit@oss.nttdata.com>
Re: ps command does not show walsender's connected db Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
Re: ps command does not show walsender's connected db bt22nakamorit <bt22nakamorit@oss.nttdata.com>
Re: ps command does not show walsender's connected db Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
Re: ps command does not show walsender's connected db bt22nakamorit <bt22nakamorit@oss.nttdata.com>
Re: ps command does not show walsender's connected db Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
Re: ps command does not show walsender's connected db Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick@gmail.com>
Re: ps command does not show walsender's connected db Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: ps command does not show walsender's connected db Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
Re: ps command does not show walsender's connected db Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 01:32:11PM +0900, Ian Lawrence Barwick wrote: > Fujii-san is marked as committer on the commifest entry for this patch [1]; > are you able to go ahead and get it committed? That's the state of the patch since the 11th of October. Seeing the lack of activity, I propose to take care of that myself if there are no objections, only on HEAD. That could be qualified as a bug, but that does not seem worth bothering the back-branches, either. Except if somebody has a different opinion? The patch looks to do the job correctly, still I would leave the extra printf() calls in BackendStartup() out. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления