Re: Slightly OT.
От | gonzales@linuxlouis.net |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Slightly OT. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.64.0706011059070.4547@mx1.linuxlouis.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Slightly OT. ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Slightly OT.
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > gonzales@linuxlouis.net wrote: >> Group, >> I have to admit, I'm a little disappointed. I'm a HUGE advocate of >> PostgreSQL(to state for the record) - in fact I always keep my eyes peeled >> for opportunities to recommend it in my day to day business. >> >> So why am I disappointed, and who really cares? >> >> I'm disappointed because SLONY-II has not been released yet to support >> multi-master replication! PostgreSQL is going through all of the releases >> - and that's great - BUT, where is the sync-up with the powerhouse of a >> component, that Slony-II would bring to the table? Slony-I is pretty >> sweet, but if Slony-II would release, I can imagine that this would >> introduce some major competition in the enterprise world against the >> commercial dyno's. > > Which databases ship with multi-master replication? I dunno, which ones? Which ones have robust and fully functional multi-master replication? (Oracle, MS SQL, not-PostgreSQL). > > Joshua D. Drake > > > > -- Louis Gonzales louis.gonzales@linuxlouis.net http://www.linuxlouis.net
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: