Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze
От | Dave Cramer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze |
Дата | |
Msg-id | D845181A-D18F-465A-AA32-978B5FD79D7F@fastcrypt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze ("Jonah H. Harris" <jonah.harris@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 13-Jul-06, at 9:29 AM, Jonah H. Harris wrote: > On 7/12/06, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> > I don't really think anyone would want to run both, but >> > that's just my opinion. >> >> On what grounds do you not think that? > > Too much Java overhead on one database and PL/J isn't that stable. > I've run into several crash problems with it before. > >> PL/J uses an external JVM, PL/Java one that is running in the >> backend process. (Or maybe it was the other way 'round, I'm too >> tired to remember tonight.) > > While tired, you're still correct :) > >> That's a really fundamental difference that makes them suited for >> very different >> applications; not to mention the resulting different licensing >> scenarios. > > Not really, both require a JVM so the same licensing still applies. > >> The points that have been made in this thread about PL/J not being >> actively maintained are important, but other than that objection, >> I can see no reason that PL/J wouldn't have an equal claim to >> inclusion >> in core. > > I'm being objective here, and PL/J is not nearly as stable or > well-maintained... that means a lot to me or to anyone who looks at > using a Java PL. Doesn't EDB sponsor pl/java ? I would think that might make you somewhat subjective ? That being said, pl-j is not as mature as pl/java, however I don't believe that is a valid reason for exclusion. Open source projects by their nature gain maturity by exposure. > Do we intend to ship both and say that one is less > capable? Have you used either of them? Don't get me wrong, I like > PL/J in concept... but it's just not even close to production-ready > yet. I know of no one using PL/J in production and about 40 or so > people using PL/Java. > >> Perhaps more, because it gives us an extra layer of insulation >> from JVM licensing questions. > > Again, I don't believe so. I'd like to hear how Dave thinks so, > though. I didn't say this > > -- > Jonah H. Harris, Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1300 > EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301 > 33 Wood Ave S, 2nd Floor | jharris@enterprisedb.com > Iselin, New Jersey 08830 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/ >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: