Re: `order by random()` makes select-list `random()` invocations deterministic
От | Dian Fay |
---|---|
Тема | Re: `order by random()` makes select-list `random()` invocations deterministic |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CZI1U3NKCZDT.31UY6DAFGVXC5@nmfay.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: `order by random()` makes select-list `random()` invocations deterministic ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: `order by random()` makes select-list `random()` invocations deterministic
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Thu Feb 29, 2024 at 12:53 AM EST, David G. Johnston wrote: > On Wednesday, February 28, 2024, Dian Fay <di@nmfay.com> wrote: > > > > > > Every `random()` invocation in the select list uses a single consistent > > value within each returned row. Remove the `order by random()` and > > values become randomized as expected, but it gets a bit stranger: > > > > > This seems to be one of those “won’t fix” bugs that stems from the parser > being a bit too liberal in what it accepts as valid SQL. > > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAKFQuwZ3-XGfcS%2BCLTAYvPx3ARYjUxv%2B%3DYL8sOicV0nda%3DT5cA%40mail.gmail.com > > The fact that the gs involving expression is seen differently than the ones > not involving gs doesn’t surprise me. > > David J. Thanks, that makes sense! Any thoughts on whether it's worth a cautionary note in the `order by` and/or random function docs since `order by random()` is a fairly well attested solution and I'm not the first person to run into this quirk?
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: