Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)
От | Maciek Sakrejda |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAOtHd0AOnW=Cz3XZM7bE2kjyyBhworCoiRMP4kZhru8u_gdN_g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?) (Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 10:38 AM Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com> wrote: > > Attached is v47. I missed a couple of versions, but I think the docs are clearer now. I'm torn on losing some of the detail, but overall I do think it's a good trade-off. Moving some details out to after the table does keep the bulk of the view documentation more readable, and the "inform database tuning" part is great. I really like the idea of a separate Interpreting Statistics section, but for now this works. >+ <literal>vacuum</literal>: I/O operations performed outside of shared >+ buffers while vacuuming and analyzing permanent relations. Why only permanent relations? Are temporary relations treated differently? I imagine if someone has a temp-table-heavy workload that requires regularly vacuuming and analyzing those relations, this point may be confusing without some additional explanation. Other than that, this looks great. Thanks, Maciek
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: