Re: Could be improved point of UPSERT

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Gianni  wrote:
> Could there be a version of UPSERT where an update is tried, and if 0 records
> are modified, an insert is done?
>
> Just wondering, I haven't got am use-case for that.  I don't mid gaps in
> sequences.

Perhaps, if you don't mind having a severely restricted set of
qualifications in the UPDATE, which the existing command effectively
has anyway. That would be a very odd thing.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan