Re: Are we missing (void) when return value of fsm_set_and_search is ignored?

On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:22 PM Julien Rouhaud  wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 6:54 PM Bharath Rupireddy
>  wrote:
> >
> > It looks like for some of the fsm_set_and_search calls whose return
> > value is ignored (in fsm_search and RecordPageWithFreeSpace), there's
> > no (void). Is it intentional? In the code base, we generally have
> > (void) when non-void return value of a function is ignored.
>
> That's a good practice, +1 for changing that.

Thanks. PSA v1 patch.

With Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.