Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes
От | Bharath Rupireddy |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CALj2ACUN6dPDtE0imOcPWZu7DXVmetjLvzHm=CebyyQfJJKcUg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 11:50 AM Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 4:07 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote: > > The Attached v15 patch has the fixes for the same. > > Thanks. The v15 patch LGTM and the cf bot is happy hence marking it as RfC. The patch was not applying because of the recent commit [1]. I took this opportunity and tried a bunch of things without modifying the core logic of the pg_log_backtrace feature that Vignesh has worked on. I did following - moved the duplicate code to a new function CheckPostgresProcessId which can be used by pg_log_backtrace, pg_log_memory_contexts, pg_signal_backend and pg_log_query_plan ([2]), modified the code comments, docs and tests to be more in sync with the commit [1], moved two of ProcessLogBacktraceInterrupt calls (archiver and wal writer) to their respective interrupt handlers. Here's the v16 version that I've come up with. [1] commit 790fbda902093c71ae47bff1414799cd716abb80 Author: Fujii Masao <fujii@postgresql.org> Date: Tue Jan 11 23:19:59 2022 +0900 Enhance pg_log_backend_memory_contexts() for auxiliary processes. [2] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20220114063846.7jygvulyu6g23kdv%40jrouhaud Regards, Bharath Rupireddy.
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: