Re: Choosing an index on partitioned tables.
От | Tim Uckun |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Choosing an index on partitioned tables. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAGuHJrNd7n0d4+Zb+uK6BeEctkKRY2OXgSc39ywciFkFBf+n2Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Choosing an index on partitioned tables. (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Choosing an index on partitioned tables.
|
Список | pgsql-general |
It's weird that it's supported on AWS and many other providers but not in the official docker images. On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 9:16 PM Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 10:51 AM Tim Uckun <timuckun@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > To be fair Timescale also adds some other features which might be > > useful. For example they add some SQL enhancements like last value > > and auto maintaining materialized views and such. The automatic > > management of partitions is also pretty big plus in my opinion. You > > can get some of the equivalent functionality by writing stored procs > > and deploying pg_cron but it's nice to have those things built in. > > If you want automatic partition management, look at pg_partman. No > need to write your own procs and deploy with cron. > > And FWIW, in reference to the discussions about AWS, it is supported on RDS. > > -- > Magnus Hagander > Me: https://www.hagander.net/ > Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: