Re: dbt2 & opteron performance
От | Denis Lussier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: dbt2 & opteron performance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | B319CFEC3B80D3408CA36F99ADE840941978F9@edb-dc1.Edb-net.EnterpriseDB.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | dbt2 & opteron performance (Mark Wong <markw@osdl.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Mark, Great stuff. One of the things that led me to PostgreSQL a couple years back was the exceptional OLTP performance I was able to wring out of it when running my own internal benchmarks against it. I have a couple questions (that I apologize if they are answered elsewhere). Note that the reason I ask is that I want to make sure we are getting close to comparing apples to apples with how the commercial companies "legally" run their tpc benchmarks. 1 - R we using 15,000 RPM SCSI drives mostly configured together as RAID-0. Also what about write-ahead logging and background writing and grouping transactions and ... 2 - I forget the brand off the top of my head, but, I don't think that most commercial tpc tests use Adaptec controllers. 3 - R we yet testing with dual core Opterons (or at least two dual core opterons) It's perfectly reasonable if because of cost considerations the answer is "not yet" to my questions above. For #1 above, a lot of people say "but that's a bad idea...". To that I say yeah, but... it's the only way to compare apples to apples when comparing Postgres to published benchmarks commercial rdbms performance. Please email me privately if there is some way EntepriseDB may be able to help. --Denis Lussier Chief Architect and Chairman EnterpriseDB Corporation > -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-hackers- > owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Mark Wong > Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 3:47 PM > To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; testperf-general@pgfoundry.org > Subject: [HACKERS] dbt2 & opteron performance > > I'm starting to get results with dbt2 on a 4-way opteron system and > wanted to share what I've got so far since people have told me in the > past that this architecture is more interesting than the itanium2 that > I've been using. > > This 4-way has 8GB of memory and four Adaptec 2200s controllers attached > to 80 spindles (eight 10-disk arrays). For those familiar with the > schema, here is a visual of the disk layout: > http://www.osdl.org/projects/dbt2dev/results/dev4-015/layout-6.html > > Results for a 600 warehouse run are there: > http://www.osdl.org/projects/dbt2dev/results/dev4-015/6/ > > The tuning is a still a bit off, but feel free to let me know if there > are any issues anyway. > > Mark > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: