Re: How filesystems matter with PostgreSQL
От | Bryan Hinton |
---|---|
Тема | Re: How filesystems matter with PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTikj7QNTV_6XlHPJnCYPAE5kh4ugxns14VoUxD0w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: How filesystems matter with PostgreSQL (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: How filesystems matter with PostgreSQL
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
UFS2 w/ soft updates on FreeBSD might be an interesting addition to the list of test cases
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
On Friday 04 June 2010 16:25:30 Tom Lane wrote:Jon: To verify you can enable it via the barrier=1 option during mounting..
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> > On Friday 04 June 2010 14:17:35 Jon Schewe wrote:
> >> XFS (logbufs=8): ~4 hours to finish
> >> ext4: ~1 hour 50 minutes to finish
> >> ext3: 15 minutes to finish
> >> ext3 on LVM: 15 minutes to finish
> >
> > My guess is that some of the difference comes from barrier differences.
> > ext4 uses barriers by default, ext3 does not.
> Or, to put it more clearly: the reason ext3 is fast is that it's unsafe.
Andres
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: