Re: BUG #18610: llvm error: __aarch64_swp4_acq_rel which could not be resolved
От
a.kozhemyakin
Тема
Re: BUG #18610: llvm error: __aarch64_swp4_acq_rel which could not be resolved
Дата
Msg-id
9e0a13b4-2402-4df0-a515-47153119e80c@postgrespro.ru
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
BUG #18610: llvm error: __aarch64_swp4_acq_rel which could not be resolved PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
Re: BUG #18610: llvm error: __aarch64_swp4_acq_rel which could not be resolved Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: BUG #18610: llvm error: __aarch64_swp4_acq_rel which could not be resolved "a.kozhemyakin" <a.kozhemyakin@postgrespro.ru>
Re: BUG #18610: llvm error: __aarch64_swp4_acq_rel which could not be resolved Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Thank you, the error no longer occurs after adding -mno-outline-atomics or -march=armv8.1-a
I installed packages on debian-12 (arm64) from https://apt.postgresql.org/pub/repos/apt, the error is repeated.
11.09.2024 16:55, Thomas Munro пишет:
Hmm, I think it is inlining spinlock code from pg_last_wal_receive_lsn()'s call to GetWalRcvFlushRecPtr(), and then failing to find fallbacks for pre-ARMv8.1 systems that didn't have the LSE atomic instructions. I wonder if there could be some mismatch in the default -march for parts of your toolchain, so that it doesn't link the library that has that stuff, but then the clang that built walreceiverfuncs.bc expects it to be found. I wonder if it goes away if you add "-mno-outline-atomics" or "-march=armv8.1-a" or "-march=armv8-a+lse" to BITCODE_CXXFLAGS (not saying that's a fix, just trying to understand what's happening...). Assuming you're using GCC, maybe "gcc -Q --help=target | grep march" could show what Ubuntu 24 has set as the baseline, and "clang -### -c -x c /dev/null" might show what clang is selecting... just ideas, I'm not sure, I don't have such a system, I just noticed a few distros cranking up the baseline instruction sets recently...
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления
От: PG Bug reporting form
Дата: