Re: partition routing layering in nodeModifyTable.c
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: partition routing layering in nodeModifyTable.c |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 902a656d-e4f2-70bf-f30f-1796d65791fe@iki.fi обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: partition routing layering in nodeModifyTable.c (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: partition routing layering in nodeModifyTable.c
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 14/10/2020 09:44, Amit Langote wrote: > I like the idea of storing the ResultRelInfo in ForeignScanState, but > it would be better if we can document the fact that an FDW may not > reliably access until IterateDirectModify(). That's because, setting > it in ExecInitForeignScan() will mean *all* result relations must be > initialized during ExecInitModifyTable(), which defies my > lazy-ResultRelInfo-initiailization proposal. As to why why I'm > pushing that proposal, consider that when we'll get the ability to use > run-time pruning for UPDATE/DELETE with [1], initializing all result > relations before initializing the plan tree will mean most of those > ResultRelInfos will be unused, because run-time pruning that occurs > when the plan tree is initialized (and/or when it is executed) may > eliminate most but a few result relations. > > I've attached a diff to v17-0001 to show one way of delaying setting > ForeignScanState.resultRelInfo. The BeginDirectModify function does a lot of expensive things, like opening a connection to the remote server. If we want to optimize run-time pruning, I think we need to avoid calling BeginDirectModify for pruned partitions altogether. I pushed this without those delay-setting-resultRelInfo changes. But we can revisit those changes with the run-time pruning optimization patch. I'll continue with the last couple of patches in this thread. - Heikki
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: