Re: [HACKERS] CVS and the backend
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: [HACKERS] CVS and the backend
Дата
Msg-id
6143.902367455@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
CVS and the backend (Peter T Mount)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
CVS and the backend Peter T Mount <peter@retep.org.uk>
Re: [HACKERS] CVS and the backend Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] CVS and the backend Peter T Mount <peter@retep.org.uk>
Re: [HACKERS] CVS and the backend t-ishii@sra.co.jp (Tatsuo Ishii)
Re: [HACKERS] CVS and the backend Peter T Mount <peter@taer.maidstone.gov.uk>
Re: [HACKERS] CVS and the backend t-ishii@sra.co.jp
Re: [HACKERS] CVS and the backend Peter T Mount <peter@retep.org.uk>
Re: [HACKERS] CVS and the backend Brett McCormick <pgsql@chicken.org>
Re: [HACKERS] CVS and the backend Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Peter T Mount writes: > I've just run CVS UPDATE again, in another attempt to get initdb to run. > Anyhow, I noticed that there was a message saying that there were > conflicts. Any ideas? That means CVS got confused about how to update your local file. Typically, it means that the file now on your disk is broken --- it will have both versions of the conflicting text. CVS is expecting you to sort it out, which would be the right thing if the difference involved a change that you needed to commit to the source tree. If the conflict is in a file that you have not got interesting private changes in, the best thing is just to delete the local copy of that file and do cvs update again to fetch a clean copy. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления