Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF?
От
Joe Conway
Тема
Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF?
Дата
Msg-id
5cc61826-13e4-9976-0d6d-fb37b01d93ac@joeconway.com
Ответ на
Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF? (Tom Lane)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Should we document IS [NOT] OF? "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF? "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF? Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>
Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF? Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>
Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF? Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF? Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>
Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF? John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF? Joshua Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
On 11/19/20 2:03 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > "David G. Johnston" writes: >> Is there a feature code? I skimmed the standard and non-standard tables in >> our appendix and couldn’t find this in either. > > a19d9d3c4 seems to have thought it was S151. Here is a link to previous list discussions: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/45DA44F3.3010401%40joeconway.com HTH, Joe -- Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
