Re: Time measurement format - more human readable
От | Gavin Flower |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Time measurement format - more human readable |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 542B14DE.7070208@archidevsys.co.nz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Time measurement format - more human readable (Bogdan Pilch <bogdan@matfyz.cz>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Please don't top post, initial context is important, especially Tom's! :-) (see my reply below) On 01/10/14 03:52, Bogdan Pilch wrote: > How about, the format of psql duration can be set via some ... > backslash command or commdn line switch? And the default of course > remains the current behavior? > > bogdan >> Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >>> On 2014-09-28 20:32:30 -0400, Gregory Smith wrote: >>>> On 9/28/14, 7:49 AM, Bogdan Pilch wrote: >>>>> I have created a small patch to postgres source (in particular the >>>>> psql part of it) that modifies the way time spent executing the SQL >>>>> commands is printed out. >>>> There are already a wide range of human readable time interval output >>>> formats available in the database; see the list at http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/datatype-datetime.html#INTERVAL-STYLE-OUTPUT-TABLE >>> He's talking about psql's \timing... >> Indeed. Still, it seems like this has more downside than upside. >> It seems likely to break some peoples' scripts, and where exactly >> is the groundswell of complaint that the existing format is >> unreadable? TBH, I've not heard even one complaint about that >> before today. On the other hand, the number of complaints we will >> get if we change the format is likely to be more than zero. >> >> regards, tom lane > As a user, your suggestion is fine by me. Cheers, Gavin
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: