Re: Non-reproducible valgrind failure on HEAD

Andres Freund  writes:
> On 2021-05-09 15:29:06 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> One point worth mentioning is that I'd forgotten to build with
>> "#define USE_VALGRIND" in the first try.  AFAIK that should make
>> valgrind strictly less sensitive, so I think it's not material,
>> but still.

> I think it may be material - see the comments in
> AddCatcacheInvalidationMessage().

Ah-hah.  Please excuse the noise.

(I wonder if we shouldn't adjust the comments in pg_config_manual.h,
though, as they certainly leave the impression that USE_VALGRIND
isn't essential.)

			regards, tom lane