Re: Documentation in book length
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Documentation in book length |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5134.1041550327@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Documentation in book length (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Documentation in book length
Re: Documentation in book length Re: Documentation in book length Re: Documentation in book length Re: Documentation in book length |
Список | pgsql-docs |
Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes: > Making the docs into one book should also allow better hyperlink > cross-referencing. That will be a welcome improvement. Yes --- eliminating our silly "it's somewhere in that part" cross-references is quite sufficient reason in my mind to abandon the option of building the docs in sections. If we have to build the whole book every time, so be it. BTW, the Red Hat RHDB group has spent a fair amount of time rethinking the overall organization of the docs and trying to organize 'em in a more logical order. They'd like to contribute that work back so they don't have to maintain a variant version of the docs. Is this a good time to think about looking over what they've done? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: