Re: [v9.3] Extra Daemons (Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database)
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [v9.3] Extra Daemons (Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 50A508E0.2040503@vmware.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [v9.3] Extra Daemons (Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database) (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 15.11.2012 17:10, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Heikki Linnakangas escribió: >> On 23.10.2012 00:29, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >>> Here's an updated version of this patch, which also works in >>> an EXEC_BACKEND environment. (I haven't tested this at all on Windows, >>> but I don't see anything that would create a portability problem there.) >> >> Looks good at first glance. > > Thanks. > >> Fails on Windows, though: >> >> "C:\postgresql\pgsql.sln" (default target) (1) -> >> "C:\postgresql\auth_counter.vcxproj" (default target) (29) -> >> (Link target) -> >> auth_counter.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol >> UnBlockSig [C:\p >> ostgresql\auth_counter.vcxproj] >> .\Release\auth_counter\auth_counter.dll : fatal error LNK1120: 1 >> unresolved externals [C:\postgresql\auth_counter.vcxproj] > > Wow. If that's the only problem it has on Windows, I am extremely > pleased. > > Were you able to test the provided test modules? I tested the auth_counter module, seemed to work. It counted all connections as "successful", though, even when I tried to log in with an invalid username/database. Didn't try with an invalid password. And I didn't try worker_spi. > I am unsure about the amount of pre-cooked stuff we need to provide. > For instance, do we want some easy way to let the user code run > transactions? Would be nice, of course. I guess it depends on how much work would it be provide that. But we can leave that for later, once the base patch is in. - Heikki
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: