Re: Enabling Checksums
От | Greg Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Enabling Checksums |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 50A18012.2080402@2ndQuadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Enabling Checksums (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/12/12 4:44 AM, Craig Ringer wrote: > Is it absurd to suggest using another bitmap, like the FSM or visibility > map, to store information on page checksumming while checksumming is > enabled but incomplete? I spent some time thinking about that last week. One problem with it is that the bitmap structure itself has the same issues as every other write here--how do we know it's going to disk accurately? The "put 'checksum on' bits on the page" idea and "put checksum on bits in a map" have the same fundamental issue. Things might get out of sync in the same way, you've just moved the potentially suspicious write to a new place. -- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg@2ndQuadrant.com Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: