Re: subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite)
От | Thomas Swan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 50957.199.222.14.2.1080248465.squirrel@www.idigx.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite) (Dustin Sallings <dustin@spy.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
<quote who="Dustin Sallings"> > > On Mar 25, 2004, at 1:21, Neil Conway wrote: > >> I think the lack of good Win32 support (unless rectified before the >> release of 7.5) is a pretty major problem with Arch -- that alone >> might be sufficient to prevent us from adopting it. > > I don't do Windows, but my understanding is that tla is as well > supported on Windows as postgres is. > It that like the best beach volleball player in Antarctica? The Windows port of Postgresql is still in its infancy. It's coming along, but its not a finished product. > The design is fundamentally easy enough that a Windows user who cares > could probably make a more suitable port for Windows than the UNIX guys > are interested in making. I've seen such discussions on the list. > > -- > Dustin Sallings > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command > (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org) >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: