Re: xlog filename formatting functions in recovery
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: xlog filename formatting functions in recovery |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 505C1683.9000808@vmware.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: xlog filename formatting functions in recovery (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: xlog filename formatting functions in recovery
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 03.07.2012 15:13, Robert Haas wrote: > On the substance of the patch, I believe the reason why this is > currently disallowed is because the TLI is implicitly taken from the > running system, and on the standby that might be the wrong value. Yeah, I believe that's the reason. So the question is, what timeline should the functions use on a standby? With the patch as it is, they use 0: postgres=# select pg_xlogfile_name_offset('3/FF020000'); pg_xlogfile_name_offset ----------------------------------- (0000000000000003000000FF,131072) (1 row) There's a few different options: 1. current recovery_target_timeline (XLogCtl->recoveryTargetTLI) 2. current ThisTimeLineID, which is bumped every time a timeline-bumping checkpoint record is replayed. (this is not currently visible to backends, but we could easily add a shared memory variable for it) 3. curFileTLI. That is, the TLI of the current file that we're replaying. This is usually the same as ThisTimeLineID, except when replaying a WAL segment where the timeline changes 4. Something else? What do you use these functions for? Which option would make the most sense? - Heikki
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: