Re: Re: Items missing from some context menus in object browser of v1.16 beta4
От | Erwin Brandstetter |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: Items missing from some context menus in object browser of v1.16 beta4 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 504FFF2F.4020701@falter.at обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: Items missing from some context menus in object browser of v1.16 beta4 (Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: Items missing from some context menus in
object browser of v1.16 beta4
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
On 11.09.2012 19:41, Guillaume Lelarge wrote: > On Sat, 2012-09-08 at 02:04 +0200, Erwin Brandstetter wrote: >> On 05.09.2012 23:12, Guillaume Lelarge wrote: >>> On Fri, 2012-08-31 at 23:55 +0200, Guillaume Lelarge wrote: >>>> On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 16:57 +0200, Erwin Brandstetter wrote: >>>>> On 27.08.2012 16:37, Erwin Brandstetter wrote: >>>>>> Aloha! >>>>>> >>>>>> I think I ran into this regression with v1.16 beta4 and filed a ticket. >>>>>> So far I have seen this to affect indexes, primary keys and foreign keys >>>>>> But *not* tables, views, function, triggers, sequences or types ... >>>>>> >>>>>> Added two small screenshots to the ticket to compare 1.4 and 1.16b4 >>>>>> http://code.pgadmin.org/trac/ticket/377 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> Erwin >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> I tried to add more details to the ticket, buthttp://code.pgadmin.org/trac/ decided to answer with error messages.. seems to be offline for now? >>>>> I'll add my findings here: >>>>> >>>>> Also seems to affect foreign keys and unique indexes. >>>>> But *not* tables, views, function, triggers, sequences or types ... >>>>> Tested with PostgreSQL 9.1 and 8.4 >>>>> >>>>> However, in seemingly arbitrary rare cases it works as it should. It's always the same for all objects under one tableso far. I tried but failed to >>>>> spot a difference between the involved tables. >>>>> >>>> As you said, the trac site seems to be done right now, so I can't check >>>> your screenshots. I know there are some issues with the indexes right >>>> now. See the thread intitled "pgAdmin III commit: Lots of work on >>>> domains, and check constraints". I have a patch that may fix your >>>> issues, but can't check as I can't see your screenshots. I mostly need >>>> an answer from Dave, to know if I should apply my patch, or revert my >>>> older patch. >>>> >>> trac is available now, thanks to Dave. >>> >>> My patch fixes the issue you found. >> I have downloaded and tested with 1.16.0 (Sep 7 2012). I am afraid my results disagree, the regression is still there,all of it. Just like in the >> screenshot in the ticket. >> >> The other thing I reported seems fixed, though: "Bug in SQL script for indexes", where the SQL script used the table nameinstead of the schema name. >> > Then you should try to give me an SQL script that I can execute and that > will show the same issue. Because I tried again, and I don't have the > issue. It affects 9 out of 10 tables here. Just like the screenshots demonstrate. Items are missing from the context menu and the DEL key is not working. I have tried again an to find anything that would bind the rare cases where it works normally together, but no luck. If I recreate the table in another schema it stops to work. If I restart pgAdmin, the same tables exhibit normal behavior, so it's not totaly random. pgAdmin 1.14.3 does not display the problem. I fail to see how I could provide an SQL script. Maybe it's specific to Windows (XP)? Regards Erwin
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: