Re: Readd use of TAP subtests

On 2/25/22 08:39, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 24.02.22 16:00, Andres Freund wrote:
>> I've incidentally played with subtests yesterdays, when porting
>> src/interfaces/libpq/test/regress.pl to a tap test. Unfortunately it
>> seems
>> that subtests aren't actually specified in the tap format, and that
>> different
>> libraries generate different output formats. The reason this matters
>> somewhat
>> is that meson's testrunner can parse tap and give nicer progress / error
>> reports. But since subtests aren't in the spec it can't currently parse
>> them...
>
> Ok that's good to know.  What exactly happens when it tries to parse
> them?  Does it not count them or does it fail somehow?  The way the
> output is structured
>
> t/001_basic.pl ..
> # Subtest: vacuumlo --help
>     ok 1 - exit code 0
>     ok 2 - goes to stdout
>     ok 3 - nothing to stderr
>     1..3
> ok 1 - vacuumlo --help
>
> it appears that it should be able to parse it nonetheless and should
> just count the non-indented lines.


AIUI TAP consumers are supposed to ignore lines they don't understand.
The Node TAP setup produces output like this, so perl is hardly alone
here. See <https://node-tap.org/docs/api/subtests/>


cheers


andrew


--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com