Re: [WIP] cache estimates, cache access cost

Greg Smith  wrote:
> The idea that any of this will run automatically is a dream at
> this point, so saying you want to automatically recover from
> problems with the mechanism that doesn't even exist yet is a bit
> premature.
Well, I certainly didn't mean it to be a reason not to move forward
with development -- I wouldn't have raised the issue had you not
said this upthread:
> I don't see how sequential scan vs. index costing will be any
> different on a fresh system than it is now.
All I was saying is: I do; here's how...
Carry on.
-Kevin