Re: Spinlock backoff algorithm
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Spinlock backoff algorithm |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 473BB930.9080902@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Spinlock backoff algorithm (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Spinlock backoff algorithm
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus wrote: > Tom, > >> I've got one upstairs (HPPA), and I believe that it's actually a pretty >> common situation in scientifically-oriented workstations from a few >> years back. > > Last I checked, scientific workstations aren't exactly a common platform for > PostgreSQL servers. > > The question is, for our most common platforms (like AMD and Intel) is the FPU > notably slower/more contended than integer division? I'd the impression that > it was, but my knowledge of chip architectures is liable to be out of date. > > Can we have a hardware geek speak up? > http://www.intel.com/performance/server/xeon/intspd.htm http://www.intel.com/performance/server/xeon/fpspeed.htm Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: