Re: Buildfarm member Narwhal: Python 2.5/8.1
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Buildfarm member Narwhal: Python 2.5/8.1 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4624D220.8000309@postgresql.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Buildfarm member Narwhal: Python 2.5/8.1 (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Buildfarm member Narwhal: Python 2.5/8.1
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan wrote: > The question in my mind is this: how much do we back-patch to cover new > and incompatible releases of software we depend on? Python 2.5 was > released on 19 Sept 2006, long after Postgres 8.1. I guess you could > make a case to say that we should back-patch to the release immediately > before the library change. I guess that depends on the invasiveness - in this case it's a couple of simple updates to the regression tests so I think it's probably worth doing. > (BTW, it is possible to include python only in certain branches in your > buildfarm client - examples are in the config file). Yeah, I already use that functionality to handle the features that we've added over past releases to the windows port (ldap, thread safety etc). Handy :-) /D
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: