Re: What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4616616D.4050206@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for? (Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
>>> VMWare Server is indeed a fine product, which I use extensively. >>> >>> I am not sure what our Windows support is like for x86_64. Magnus has >>> one for MSVC (for which buildfarm support is nearly done, but not >>> quite). But I don't see one for MinGW. OTOH, Windows is not free (in >>> either sense) and setting up a build environment there is quite a bit >>> harder than on Unix platforms. >> >> yeah improving windows coverage might be a nice thing - some other >> random thoughts might include: >> *) a linux x86_64 box with say the non-commercial version of icc (intel >> c compiler) >> *) recent netbsd/amd64 >> *) solaris 10/x86 - gcc and sun studio >> *) maybe solaris express/opensolaris? >> *) as said early we don't seem to have any suse/novell coverage at all > > I'll see what I can do on the NetBSD and Solaris fronts. > IMO, the Solaris one is probably more important than NetBSD. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: