Re: Bug or intentionally under-documented "\c databasename;" behavior?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: Bug or intentionally under-documented "\c databasename;" behavior?
Дата
Msg-id
4059188.1669392529@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Bug or intentionally under-documented "\c databasename;" behavior? "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Re: Bug or intentionally under-documented "\c databasename;" behavior? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
"David G. Johnston"  writes:
> I expected the following to tell me: database "testdb;" does not exist
> Instead the connection attempt was successful.

> postgres=# create database testdb;
> CREATE DATABASE
> postgres=# \c testdb;
> You are now connected to database "testdb" as user "vagrant".

This is because psql_scan_slash_option was told to strip any trailing
semicolon, and did so.  If there's any rhyme or reason to which
psql metacommands pass semicolon=true and which do not, I can't
detect it :-(.  And you're right that there's nothing about it in
the documentation.

I wonder if we can get away with removing that quirk.  Or else try
to establish some policy about it, and document the policy.

A really brave person might propose nuking the OT_SQLIDHACK parsing
mode as well.  That was never supposed to be a long-term fixture.

			regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления
От: David G. Johnston
Дата:
От: PG Bug reporting form
Дата:
FAQ