Re: Problem with debian package version number

Andreas Pflug wrote:

> Raphaël Enrici wrote:
>
>> I did a big mistake when I began to number debian packages...
>> What are you planning to do concerning the pgAdmin3 version number
>> for the beta release ?
>> Will this stay 0.8.0 ? Or will this become something else greater
>> than 0.8.0 (would be nice...) ? Does someone has an idea of the date
>> this release is planned ?
>
> Hi Raphaël,
> so far we don't have an agreed schema of numbering, so this is the
> right moment to make proposals and decide.
> IMHO, the first beta will be 0.90,  following development versions
> 0.91, the second beta 0.92, ...


Hi Andreas,
it sounds good to me and will allow me to handle a better package
version numbering. I've also looked to some other versionning schemes
(mozilla's one for example) but don't like them. Par numbers for quite
stable release and odd number for development ones has worked nice for
long on other projects. What would be the better way to handle the case
of 0.98 if not sufficient enough ? May be we can add some rc1, rc2, rc3
for release candidates before final 1.0 ?

Another question: as far as I remember Dave planned to suppress YYYYMMDD
tag from these releases' sources, is it still in the air ?

Cheers,

Raphaël