Re: Solaris
От
Mark Kirkwood
Тема
Re: Solaris
Дата
Msg-id
3EAA16E7.1030604@paradise.net.nz
Ответ на
Re: Solaris (scott.marlowe)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Solaris "Ian Harding" <ianh@tpchd.org>
Re: Solaris Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>
Re: Solaris Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz>
Re: Solaris Andrew Sullivan <andrew@libertyrms.info>
Re: Solaris Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz>
Re: Solaris Andrew Sullivan <andrew@libertyrms.info>
Re: Solaris Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz>
Re: Solaris Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Solaris Andrew Sullivan <andrew@libertyrms.info>
Re: Solaris "scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>
Re: Solaris Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz>
Re: Solaris "scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>
Re: Solaris Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: Solaris Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz>
Re: Solaris Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
qsort (was Re: Solaris) Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Solaris Richard Welty <rwelty@averillpark.net>
Re: Solaris "scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>
Re: Solaris Hadley Willan <hadley.willan@deeperdesign.co.nz>
scott.marlowe wrote: >My general experience from a year ago was that Linux was about 2 to 3 >times faster on older 32 bit sparc hardware than Solaris, and just under 2 >times as fast on 64 bit hardware. > Wow - 2 times faster is significant ! It would be interesting to try a midrange SMP box ( e.g E280/E480 ). > The issue in the past was mainly that Solaris had a brain damaged >sort() call that was very slow when it had a lot of duplicate keys. That >has since been updated by Sun. > > Hmm - I ran into that situation with qsort() and many equal keys (see Hackers thread "Solaris Performance"). Sadly Sun have not amended that situation at all (in Solaris 8 anyway). best wishes Mark
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления
