Re: tsearch Parser Hacking

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
David E. Wheeler
Тема
Re: tsearch Parser Hacking
Дата
Msg-id
3C434EAE-819A-4FD0-ADEC-07A0EE955A14@kineticode.com
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
tsearch Parser Hacking "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>
Re: tsearch Parser Hacking Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: tsearch Parser Hacking "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>
Re: tsearch Parser Hacking Sushant Sinha <sushant354@gmail.com>
Re: tsearch Parser Hacking Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>
Re: tsearch Parser Hacking David Blewett <david@dawninglight.net>
Re: tsearch Parser Hacking Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>
Re: tsearch Parser Hacking "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>
Re: tsearch Parser Hacking Jesper Krogh <jesper@krogh.cc>
Re: tsearch Parser Hacking Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>
Re: tsearch Parser Hacking Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>
Re: tsearch Parser Hacking "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>
Re: tsearch Parser Hacking Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>
On Feb 14, 2011, at 11:44 PM, Oleg Bartunov wrote:

>> IMO, sooner or later we need to trash that code and replace it with
>> something a bit more modification-friendly.
> 
> We thought about configurable parser, but AFAIR, we didn't get any support for this at that time.

What would it take to change the requirement such that *any* SQL function could be a parser, not only C functions? Maybe require that they turn a nested array of tokens? That way I could just write a function in PL/Perl quite easily.

Best,

David


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: David E. Wheeler
Дата:
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
FAQ