Re: [HACKERS] common area
От | Vadim B. Mikheev |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] common area |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 34F6E37A.452C69E9@sable.krasnoyarsk.su обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] common area (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > Oracle: > > I needed 24 seconds and 1937 microseconds for the insert test. > > I needed 1 seconds and 600641 microseconds for the selection&projection test. > > I needed 1 seconds and 703673 microseconds for the join test. > > I needed 2 seconds and 404709 microseconds for the update test. > > > > PostgreSQL with -F: > > I needed 10 seconds and 297716 microseconds for the insert test. > > I needed 28 seconds and 964208 microseconds for the selection&projection test. > > I needed 83 seconds and 931762 microseconds for the join test. > > I needed 0 seconds and 588390 microseconds for the update test. > > This seems strange. Is a vacuum being done so the optimizer knows how > large each table is? You're right, Bruce. I don't see VACUUM in Michael' programm. This also affects the second test (selection&projection): during select backend updates data pages to set commit/abort statuses for tuples' xactions. Vadim
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: